Some scholars such as Westar Institute's favourite Richard I. Pervo suggest that Acts relies on Josephus. Acts really isn't my thing historically, however, why not reverse the roles and insist Luke-Acts is a source for Josephus?
Starting on the 22nd (and hopefully no earlier as I have a lot of work to do by then) I will start looking into it.
Dear non-existent readers, if this has been done before (scholarly or just for fun) or there are major and obvious objections please do point it out.
No comments:
Post a Comment